ESTE SERVICIO PUEDE CONTENER TRADUCCIONES DE GOOGLE. GOOGLE NIEGA CUALQUIER RESPONSABILIDAD RELACIONADA CON LAS TRADUCCIONES, EXPRESA O IMPLÍCITA, INCLUYENDO CUALQUIER RESPONSABILIDAD ACERCA DE LA PRECISIÓN, LA CONFIABILIDAD Y CUALQUIER RESPONSABILIDAD IMPLÍCITA DE COMERCIABILIDAD, IDONEIDAD PARA UN PROPÓSITO EN PARTICULAR Y DE NO INFRACCIÓN. Por su comodidad, se ha traducido el sitio web de Kaspersky Lab utilizando un software de traducción de Google Translate. Se hicieron unos esfuerzos razonables para proporcionar una traducción precisa; no obstante, las traducciones automáticas no son perfectas y no hay ninguna intención de sustituir el trabajo de los traductores. Se proporcionan estas traducciones como un servicio para los usuarios del sitio web de Kaspersky Lab y se han publicado tal "como es". No hay ninguna garantía, expresa o implícita, acerca de la precisión, la confiabilidad o exactitud de cualquier traducción desde el inglés a cualquier otro idioma. La traducción de algunos contenidos (imágenes, videos, Flash, etc) podrían no ser totalmente fiel debido a las limitaciones del software de traducción.
Update Date
11/01/2024

Clase: Virus

Los virus se replican en los recursos de la máquina local. A diferencia de los gusanos, los virus no usan los servicios de red para propagarse o penetrar en otras computadoras. Una copia de un virus llegará a las computadoras remotas solo si el objeto infectado, por alguna razón no relacionada con la función del virus, está activado en otra computadora. Por ejemplo: al infectar discos accesibles, un virus penetra en un archivo ubicado en un recurso de red, un virus se copia en un dispositivo de almacenamiento extraíble o infecta un archivo en un dispositivo extraíble, un usuario envía un correo electrónico con un archivo adjunto infectado.

Más información

Plataforma: DOS

No platform description

Familia: Virus.DOS.Abraxas

No family description

Examples

884B1A9FBCCE4467C26383E02643C57F

Tactics and Techniques: Mitre*

TA0003
Persistence
The adversary is trying to maintain their foothold.

Persistence consists of techniques that adversaries use to keep access to systems across restarts, changed credentials, and other interruptions that could cut off their access. Techniques used for persistence include any access, action, or configuration changes that let them maintain their foothold on systems, such as replacing or hijacking legitimate code or adding startup code.
T1098
Account Manipulation
Adversaries may manipulate accounts to maintain and/or elevate access to victim systems. Account manipulation may consist of any action that preserves or modifies adversary access to a compromised account, such as modifying credentials or permission groups. These actions could also include account activity designed to subvert security policies, such as performing iterative password updates to bypass password duration policies and preserve the life of compromised credentials.

In order to create or manipulate accounts, the adversary must already have sufficient permissions on systems or the domain. However, account manipulation may also lead to privilege escalation where modifications grant access to additional roles, permissions, or higher-privileged Valid Accounts.
TA0004
Privilege Escalation
The adversary is trying to gain higher-level permissions.

Privilege Escalation consists of techniques that adversaries use to gain higher-level permissions on a system or network. Adversaries can often enter and explore a network with unprivileged access but require elevated permissions to follow through on their objectives. Common approaches are to take advantage of system weaknesses, misconfigurations, and vulnerabilities. Examples of elevated access include:

* SYSTEM/root level
* local administrator
* user account with admin-like access
* user accounts with access to specific system or perform specific function

These techniques often overlap with Persistence techniques, as OS features that let an adversary persist can execute in an elevated context.
T1134
Access Token Manipulation
Adversaries may modify access tokens to operate under a different user or system security context to perform actions and bypass access controls. Windows uses access tokens to determine the ownership of a running process. A user can manipulate access tokens to make a running process appear as though it is the child of a different process or belongs to someone other than the user that started the process. When this occurs, the process also takes on the security context associated with the new token.

An adversary can use built-in Windows API functions to copy access tokens from existing processes; this is known as token stealing. These token can then be applied to an existing process (i.e. Token Impersonation/Theft) or used to spawn a new process (i.e. Create Process with Token). An adversary must already be in a privileged user context (i.e. administrator) to steal a token. However, adversaries commonly use token stealing to elevate their security context from the administrator level to the SYSTEM level. An adversary can then use a token to authenticate to a remote system as the account for that token if the account has appropriate permissions on the remote system.(Citation: Pentestlab Token Manipulation)

Any standard user can use the runas command, and the Windows API functions, to create impersonation tokens; it does not require access to an administrator account. There are also other mechanisms, such as Active Directory fields, that can be used to modify access tokens.
TA0005
Defense Evasion
The adversary is trying to avoid being detected. Defense Evasion consists of techniques that adversaries use to avoid detection throughout their compromise. Techniques used for defense evasion include uninstalling/disabling security software or obfuscating/encrypting data and scripts. Adversaries also leverage and abuse trusted processes to hide and masquerade their malware. Other tactics' techniques are cross-listed here when those techniques include the added benefit of subverting defenses.
T1036.005
Match Legitimate Name or Location
Adversaries may match or approximate the name or location of legitimate files or resources when naming/placing them. This is done for the sake of evading defenses and observation. This may be done by placing an executable in a commonly trusted directory (ex: under System32) or giving it the name of a legitimate, trusted program (ex: svchost.exe). In containerized environments, this may also be done by creating a resource in a namespace that matches the naming convention of a container pod or cluster. Alternatively, a file or container image name given may be a close approximation to legitimate programs/images or something innocuous.
T1036.007
Double File Extension
Adversaries may abuse a double extension in the filename as a means of masquerading the true file type. A file name may include a secondary file type extension that may cause only the first extension to be displayed (ex: File.txt.exe may render in some views as just File.txt). However, the second extension is the true file type that determines how the file is opened and executed. The real file extension may be hidden by the operating system in the file browser (ex: explorer.exe), as well as in any software configured using or similar to the system’s policies.
T1134
Access Token Manipulation
Adversaries may modify access tokens to operate under a different user or system security context to perform actions and bypass access controls. Windows uses access tokens to determine the ownership of a running process. A user can manipulate access tokens to make a running process appear as though it is the child of a different process or belongs to someone other than the user that started the process. When this occurs, the process also takes on the security context associated with the new token.

An adversary can use built-in Windows API functions to copy access tokens from existing processes; this is known as token stealing. These token can then be applied to an existing process (i.e. Token Impersonation/Theft) or used to spawn a new process (i.e. Create Process with Token). An adversary must already be in a privileged user context (i.e. administrator) to steal a token. However, adversaries commonly use token stealing to elevate their security context from the administrator level to the SYSTEM level. An adversary can then use a token to authenticate to a remote system as the account for that token if the account has appropriate permissions on the remote system.(Citation: Pentestlab Token Manipulation)

Any standard user can use the runas command, and the Windows API functions, to create impersonation tokens; it does not require access to an administrator account. There are also other mechanisms, such as Active Directory fields, that can be used to modify access tokens.

* © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation.

Kaspersky Next:
ciberseguridad redefinida
Leer más
Nuevo Kaspersky
¡Su vida digital merece una protección completa!
Leer más
Do you want to save your changes?
Your message has been sent successfully.