BU SERVİS, GOOGLE TARAFINDAN SAĞLANAN ÇEVİRİLER İÇEREBİLİR. GOOGLE, HERHANGİ BİR GARANTİ, GÜVENİLİRLİK VE TİCARİ ELVERİŞLİLİK, BELİRLİ BİR AMACA UYGUNLUK VE İHLAL ETMEME GARANTİLERİ DAHİL OLMAK ÜZERE AÇIK VEYA ZIMNİ GARANTİLER DE DAHİL OLMAK ÜZERE, AÇIK VEYA ZIMNİ TÜM GARANTİLERİ REDDEDER. Kaspersky Lab web sitesi, Google Çeviri tarafından desteklenen çeviri yazılımı kullanılarak size kolaylık sağlamak amacıyla tercüme edilmiştir. Doğru bir çeviri sağlamak için makul çabalar sarf edilmiştir, ancak otomatik çeviri mükemmel değildir ve insan çevirmenlerinin yerini alması amaçlanmamıştır. Çeviriler, Kaspersky Lab web sitesinin kullanıcılarına bir hizmet olarak sunulur ve "olduğu gibi" sağlanır. İngilizce'den başka bir dile çevrilmiş herhangi bir çevirinin doğruluğu, güvenilirliği veya doğruluğu konusunda açık ya da zımni hiçbir garanti verilmemektedir. Çeviri yazılımı sınırlamaları nedeniyle bazı içerikler (görüntüler, videolar, Flash vb. Gibi) doğru bir şekilde çevrilemeyebilir.
Güncelleme Tarihi
01/31/2024

Sınıf: Trojan

Kullanıcının faaliyetlerini elektronik olarak gözetlemek için tasarlanmış kötü amaçlı bir program (klavye girişini durdur, ekran görüntüsü al, etkin uygulamaların listesini yakala, vb.). Toplanan bilgiler, e-posta, FTP ve HTTP (istek üzerine veri göndererek) dahil olmak üzere çeşitli yollarla siber suçluya gönderilir.

Platform: Win32

Win32, 32-bit uygulamaların yürütülmesini destekleyen Windows NT tabanlı işletim sistemlerinde (Windows XP, Windows 7, vb.) Bir API'dir. Dünyanın en yaygın programlama platformlarından biri.

Aile: Trojan.Win32.Runner

No family description

Examples

64E8730D55CD6E88A3FD32F2F83BBA26
55F8918CF6CA012498823739B66911FF
E5535109245C1A5591AFB3996AAFEED3
8D29703DBF285213CAFA67DA627948E3
61427859624674D392C1625A8F7989CF

Tactics and Techniques: Mitre*

TA0002
Execution
The adversary is trying to run malicious code.

Execution consists of techniques that result in adversary-controlled code running on a local or remote system. Techniques that run malicious code are often paired with techniques from all other tactics to achieve broader goals, like exploring a network or stealing data. For example, an adversary might use a remote access tool to run a PowerShell script that does Remote System Discovery.
T1204.002
User Execution: Malicious File
An adversary may rely upon a user opening a malicious file in order to gain execution. Users may be subjected to social engineering to get them to open a file that will lead to code execution. This user action will typically be observed as follow-on behavior from Spearphishing Attachment. Adversaries may use several types of files that require a user to execute them, including .doc, .pdf, .xls, .rtf, .scr, .exe, .lnk, .pif, and .cpl.

Adversaries may employ various forms of Masquerading and Obfuscated Files or Information to increase the likelihood that a user will open and successfully execute a malicious file. These methods may include using a familiar naming convention and/or password protecting the file and supplying instructions to a user on how to open it.(Citation: Password Protected Word Docs)

While Malicious File frequently occurs shortly after Initial Access it may occur at other phases of an intrusion, such as when an adversary places a file in a shared directory or on a user's desktop hoping that a user will click on it. This activity may also be seen shortly after Internal Spearphishing.
TA0004
Privilege Escalation
The adversary is trying to gain higher-level permissions.

Privilege Escalation consists of techniques that adversaries use to gain higher-level permissions on a system or network. Adversaries can often enter and explore a network with unprivileged access but require elevated permissions to follow through on their objectives. Common approaches are to take advantage of system weaknesses, misconfigurations, and vulnerabilities. Examples of elevated access include:

* SYSTEM/root level
* local administrator
* user account with admin-like access
* user accounts with access to specific system or perform specific function

These techniques often overlap with Persistence techniques, as OS features that let an adversary persist can execute in an elevated context.
T1134
Access Token Manipulation
Adversaries may modify access tokens to operate under a different user or system security context to perform actions and bypass access controls. Windows uses access tokens to determine the ownership of a running process. A user can manipulate access tokens to make a running process appear as though it is the child of a different process or belongs to someone other than the user that started the process. When this occurs, the process also takes on the security context associated with the new token.

An adversary can use built-in Windows API functions to copy access tokens from existing processes; this is known as token stealing. These token can then be applied to an existing process (i.e. Token Impersonation/Theft) or used to spawn a new process (i.e. Create Process with Token). An adversary must already be in a privileged user context (i.e. administrator) to steal a token. However, adversaries commonly use token stealing to elevate their security context from the administrator level to the SYSTEM level. An adversary can then use a token to authenticate to a remote system as the account for that token if the account has appropriate permissions on the remote system.(Citation: Pentestlab Token Manipulation)

Any standard user can use the runas command, and the Windows API functions, to create impersonation tokens; it does not require access to an administrator account. There are also other mechanisms, such as Active Directory fields, that can be used to modify access tokens.
TA0005
Defense Evasion
The adversary is trying to avoid being detected.

Defense Evasion consists of techniques that adversaries use to avoid detection throughout their compromise. Techniques used for defense evasion include uninstalling/disabling security software or obfuscating/encrypting data and scripts. Adversaries also leverage and abuse trusted processes to hide and masquerade their malware. Other tactics’ techniques are cross-listed here when those techniques include the added benefit of subverting defenses.
T1134
Access Token Manipulation
Adversaries may modify access tokens to operate under a different user or system security context to perform actions and bypass access controls. Windows uses access tokens to determine the ownership of a running process. A user can manipulate access tokens to make a running process appear as though it is the child of a different process or belongs to someone other than the user that started the process. When this occurs, the process also takes on the security context associated with the new token.

An adversary can use built-in Windows API functions to copy access tokens from existing processes; this is known as token stealing. These token can then be applied to an existing process (i.e. Token Impersonation/Theft) or used to spawn a new process (i.e. Create Process with Token). An adversary must already be in a privileged user context (i.e. administrator) to steal a token. However, adversaries commonly use token stealing to elevate their security context from the administrator level to the SYSTEM level. An adversary can then use a token to authenticate to a remote system as the account for that token if the account has appropriate permissions on the remote system.(Citation: Pentestlab Token Manipulation)

Any standard user can use the runas command, and the Windows API functions, to create impersonation tokens; it does not require access to an administrator account. There are also other mechanisms, such as Active Directory fields, that can be used to modify access tokens.

* © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation.

Kaspersky IT Security Calculator
Daha fazla bilgi edin
Yeni Kaspersky!
Dijital hayatınız güçlü korumayı hak ediyor!
Daha fazla bilgi edin
Do you want to save your changes?
Your message has been sent successfully.